Key Takeaway
When a visa or permit application is refused by the Department of Home Affairs (DHA), the applicant has several avenues of recourse. Understanding the appeals process is critical for practitioners and applicants alike, as the system has been under significant strain since the 2025 backlog-clearing initiative resulted in high rejection rates (reported up to 70-80% by some immigration agents, though DHA claims 27% in line with historical trends).
Appeals & Review Process - South Africa Immigration
Overview
When a visa or permit application is refused by the Department of Home Affairs (DHA), the applicant has several avenues of recourse. Understanding the appeals process is critical for practitioners and applicants alike, as the system has been under significant strain since the 2025 backlog-clearing initiative resulted in high rejection rates (reported up to 70-80% by some immigration agents, though DHA claims 27% in line with historical trends).
Key legislation:
- Immigration Act 13 of 2002, Section 8(1) (internal appeals)
- Promotion of Administrative Justice Act 3 of 2000 (PAJA) (judicial review)
- Constitution of South Africa, Section 33 (right to just administrative action)
INTERNAL DHA APPEALS
First Appeal - To the Director-General
Legal basis: Section 8(1)(a) of the Immigration Act
Timeline:
- Must be lodged within 10 working days (approximately 14 calendar days) from receipt of the rejection letter
- VFS Global strictly enforces this deadline
- Late appeals are generally not accepted
How to lodge:
- Obtain a copy of the rejection letter from VFS Global
- Prepare a comprehensive appeal submission including:
- Cover letter addressing each ground of refusal
- Legal arguments referencing the Immigration Act and Regulations
- Any additional or corrected documentation
- Supporting affidavits where relevant
- Submit the appeal at the VFS Global office where the original application was made
- Pay the appeal fee (if applicable)
- Obtain a receipt/acknowledgment of the appeal submission
What the DG considers:
- Whether the original decision was correctly made according to law
- Whether all relevant documentation was considered
- Whether the refusal reasons are factually and legally sound
- Any new information submitted with the appeal
Processing time:
- Officially: No formal prescribed timeline
- In practice: 2-12 months depending on complexity
- Current backlog: Appeals are taking 8-12+ months as of 2025/2026
- No reliable tracking or reference number system exists for appeals
Possible outcomes:
- Appeal upheld (original refusal overturned, visa granted)
- Appeal dismissed (refusal confirmed)
- Request for additional documentation
Second Appeal - To the Minister of Home Affairs
Legal basis: Section 8(1)(b) of the Immigration Act
If the first appeal to the Director-General is unsuccessful, the applicant may lodge a second appeal to the Minister of Home Affairs.
Timeline:
- Must be lodged within 10 working days of receiving the DG's decision
- Same submission process through VFS Global
What the Minister considers:
- The merits of the case afresh
- Whether the DG's decision was correct
- Policy considerations and ministerial discretion
Processing time:
- Typically longer than the first appeal
- Can take 6-18 months
Important note: The Minister's decision is the final internal remedy. After this, the applicant must pursue judicial review.
JUDICIAL REVIEW - HIGH COURT
Legal Framework
PAJA (Promotion of Administrative Justice Act 3 of 2000): Section 6(2) of PAJA sets out the grounds for judicial review of administrative action:
- (a) The administrator was not authorized to take the action
- (b) The action was taken under a law that is unconstitutional
- (c) The action was procedurally unfair
- (d) The action was materially influenced by an error of law
- (e) The action was taken for a reason not authorized by the empowering provision
- (f) The action was taken arbitrarily or capriciously, or was not rationally connected to the purpose or information before the administrator
- (g) The action was taken in bad faith
- (h) The action was so unreasonable that no reasonable person would have taken it
- (i) The action was unconstitutional or unlawful
Constitution Section 33: Everyone has the right to administrative action that is lawful, reasonable, and procedurally fair.
When to Pursue Judicial Review
- After exhausting internal remedies (first and second appeal), OR
- When the DHA unreasonably delays processing a visa application (mandamus application)
- When the DHA fails to make a decision within a reasonable time
- When there is an urgent need (interim relief applications)
The Judicial Review Process
- Instruct an attorney - Must be an admitted attorney or advocate
- Letter of demand - Formal demand to the DHA to reconsider (often triggers resolution)
- Launch application - File a notice of motion and founding affidavit in the High Court
- Rule 53 record - Court orders DHA to produce the record of the decision
- Answering affidavit - DHA responds
- Reply - Applicant replies
- Hearing - Matter set down for hearing
- Judgment - Court makes its order
Typical Court Orders
- Setting aside the refusal and remitting it back to DHA for reconsideration
- Directing DHA to issue the visa (in clear-cut cases)
- Mandamus - ordering DHA to make a decision within a specified timeframe
- Costs order - DHA may be ordered to pay the applicant's legal costs
VisaFlow
Want to automate your visa workflow?
Join hundreds of South African immigration firms using VisaFlow to manage cases, documents, and clients.
Learn more →Timeframes for Judicial Review
- PAJA requires judicial review to be instituted within 180 days of the internal remedies being exhausted
- Court may extend this period in appropriate circumstances
- From filing to judgment: typically 6-18 months (non-urgent matters)
- Urgent applications: can be heard within days to weeks
Cost Considerations
- Legal fees for judicial review: R50,000 - R300,000+ depending on complexity
- If successful, the court may order DHA to pay a portion of legal costs
- Legal aid may be available for deserving cases
IMMIGRATION DIRECTIVE 22 OF 2025 (CONCESSION)
Background
Due to the massive backlog in processing waiver and appeal applications, the DHA issued Immigration Directive No. 22 of 2025 on 23 September 2025, with an amendment on 30 September 2025.
What It Provides
- Foreign nationals with pending waiver applications or long-term visa appeal applications may remain lawfully in South Africa until 31 March 2026
- They are protected from being declared "undesirable persons"
- They may travel in and out of South Africa during this period
Who Is Covered
- Foreign nationals who were legally admitted to South Africa
- Those with pending waiver applications at DHA
- Those with pending long-term visa appeal applications
Who Is NOT Covered
- Permanent residency appeals are excluded (clarified by the 30 September amendment)
- Only long-term visa appeals fall under the concession
- Persons who entered South Africa illegally
Requirements
- Must be able to prove the application is still in process
- Must carry proof of the pending application when travelling
Key Dates
- Effective: 1 October 2025
- Expiry: 31 March 2026
- May be extended if processing backlogs persist
COMMON GROUNDS FOR VISA REFUSAL
Documentation Issues
- Incomplete documentation - Missing required documents
- Expired documents - Police clearance, medical report, or passport validity issues
- Incorrect forms - Wrong application form or version
- Poor quality - Illegible copies or uncertified documents
- Missing translations - Foreign-language documents not translated by sworn translator
Substantive Grounds
- Failure to meet prescribed requirements - Not meeting specific visa criteria
- Insufficient financial means - Bank statements not showing adequate funds
- Points threshold not met - Below 100 points for work visas
- SAQA evaluation issues - Qualification not recognized or below required NQF level
- Professional registration - Missing or incomplete professional body registration
- Prohibited person status - Criminal record, previous deportation, or overstay
Procedural Issues
- Application filed at wrong office - Incorrect VFS location
- Late submission - Application filed after visa expiry
- Misrepresentation - Inconsistencies in application or documentation
- Section 10 grounds - Health, security, or character concerns
Visa-Specific Common Refusal Reasons
Work Visas:
- Employer not verified or non-compliant
- Job offer not genuine
- Qualifications not matching job requirements
- Salary below minimum threshold
Business Visas:
- Investment not meeting R5 million minimum
- DTIC recommendation not obtained
- Business plan not viable
- 60% SA employment ratio not demonstrated
Spousal/Relative's Visas:
- Relationship not proven genuine
- Financial guarantee insufficient
- Marriage/partnership documentation incomplete
Study Visas:
- Institution not recognized
- Financial means not demonstrated
- Medical insurance not valid in SA
REAPPLICATION VS. APPEAL
When to Reapply (Fresh Application)
- If the refusal was due to missing or incorrect documentation that can be corrected
- If the original application was procedurally flawed
- If the application was submitted outside South Africa (appeals from abroad are complex)
- If you can address all stated refusal reasons with new documentation
- If the appeal timeline has expired
When to Appeal
- If the rejection appears unjust or based on a DHA error
- If you meet all requirements and the refusal reasons are factually wrong
- If the refusal is based on a misinterpretation of law or regulations
- If you need to remain in South Africa while the matter is resolved
- If the refusal relates to a policy issue rather than documentation
Strategic Considerations
- Time: Reapplication may be faster (4-8 weeks vs. 2-12+ months for appeal)
- Cost: Reapplication requires new application fees; appeals may require legal assistance
- Precedent: A successful appeal sets a stronger precedent than a new application
- Legal status: An appeal preserves your legal status in SA; a new application may not
PROPOSED REFORMS (WHITE PAPER 2025)
Single DHA Review/Appeals Authority
The Revised White Paper proposes establishing an independent Single Appeals Authority that will:
- Conduct independent reviews of all DHA administrative decisions
- Consider each case on its merits with a "fresh look" at facts, law, and policy
- Have power to agree with, change, or make a new decision
- Cover all areas: visas, permits, migration, refugee decisions, border enforcement
- Aim to expedite outcomes and reduce litigation
Specialized Immigration Courts
The White Paper also proposes:
- Dedicated immigration courts to handle immigration disputes and appeals
- Integrated litigation/case-tracking IT systems
- Reduced High Court backlogs
- Faster enforcement and adjudication
Timeline
- White Paper published: December 2025
- Public consultation deadline: 15 February 2026
- Expected to be presented as a bill after consultation
- Implementation timeline: TBD (likely 2027-2028 at earliest)
TIPS FOR SUCCESSFUL APPEALS
For Practitioners
- Read the refusal reasons carefully - Address each ground specifically
- Reference legislation - Cite specific sections of the Immigration Act and Regulations
- Submit comprehensive documentation - Include everything that supports your case
- Obtain legal opinions - Where legal interpretation is at issue
- Keep copies - Maintain complete records of all submissions
- Follow up - Regularly check on appeal status (despite limited tracking)
- Consider urgency applications - If the client's situation requires immediate resolution
- Document everything - Create a timeline of all interactions with DHA
For Applicants
- Act within the deadline - You have only 10 working days
- Seek professional help - Appeals require knowledge of immigration law
- Don't resubmit the same application - An appeal must address why the refusal was wrong
- Keep your visa valid - If possible, maintain legal status while appealing
- Be truthful - Misrepresentation in an appeal can lead to permanent refusal
- Gather additional evidence - Strengthen weak areas identified in the refusal
KEY SOURCES
- Immigration Act 13 of 2002: https://www.saflii.org/za/legis/consol_act/ia2002138/
- PAJA: https://www.saflii.org/za/legis/consol_act/poaja2000396/
- DHA Immigration Directive 22 of 2025: https://www.dha.gov.za/images/notices/Revised-Immigration-Directive_22-of-2025.pdf
- CDH Immigration Law Alerts: https://www.cliffedekkerhofmeyr.com/en/sectors/immigration.html
- Xpatweb Appeals Guide: https://www.xpatweb.com/visa-rejection-appeal/



